http://www.stourbridgefc.com/news/open-discussion-evening-150-club-draw-this-thursday-1339361.html
Stourbridge Football Club-Unofficial Forum
Jack wrote:Was about to put this up. I know some can't get there, however if you have issues, which a lot of you do have. NOW is the time to actually say something, not just on here. Theyre giving you the opportunity, take it.
Nath wrote:Jack wrote:Was about to put this up. I know some can't get there, however if you have issues, which a lot of you do have. NOW is the time to actually say something, not just on here. Theyre giving you the opportunity, take it.
Mmmm.......maybe the powers that be are starting to take notice of what gets mentioned on here. At the end of the day, we are all Stourbridge fans, we all just want the best for the club. The forum is a place to be able to give an opinion and we all should continue to do just that. The world would be a boring place if everyone thought the same and had the same opinions. A good debate is perfectly healthy and should be encouraged. Is it going to be a formal questions and answer session with Andy P and Gary chairing it? If a discussion evening has been planned,that would certainly be the better way to work it.
Devil's Advocate wrote:Nath wrote:Jack wrote:Was about to put this up. I know some can't get there, however if you have issues, which a lot of you do have. NOW is the time to actually say something, not just on here. Theyre giving you the opportunity, take it.
Mmmm.......maybe the powers that be are starting to take notice of what gets mentioned on here. At the end of the day, we are all Stourbridge fans, we all just want the best for the club. The forum is a place to be able to give an opinion and we all should continue to do just that. The world would be a boring place if everyone thought the same and had the same opinions. A good debate is perfectly healthy and should be encouraged. Is it going to be a formal questions and answer session with Andy P and Gary chairing it? If a discussion evening has been planned,that would certainly be the better way to work it.
So why does it say that questions have to be in by Wednesday evening then,are they being vetted?
This is not a bad idea as long as it's Andy P and Gary sat at the front of the room answering the questions and nobody else.
If the club are serious about having a serious and proper discussion then they have to be prepared for people to come along and have a really good say and not to just roll their eyes at the questions and get defensive with their replies just because someone has had the audacity to ask something that irritates them due to all the effort they've put in down their years at the club.
I have a very simple question,the reply to which should only take six numbers arranged in a particular order starting with a 1,
How much money is in the club coffers?
Nath wrote:Devil's Advocate wrote:Nath wrote:Jack wrote:Was about to put this up. I know some can't get there, however if you have issues, which a lot of you do have. NOW is the time to actually say something, not just on here. Theyre giving you the opportunity, take it.
Mmmm.......maybe the powers that be are starting to take notice of what gets mentioned on here. At the end of the day, we are all Stourbridge fans, we all just want the best for the club. The forum is a place to be able to give an opinion and we all should continue to do just that. The world would be a boring place if everyone thought the same and had the same opinions. A good debate is perfectly healthy and should be encouraged. Is it going to be a formal questions and answer session with Andy P and Gary chairing it? If a discussion evening has been planned,that would certainly be the better way to work it.
So why does it say that questions have to be in by Wednesday evening then,are they being vetted?
This is not a bad idea as long as it's Andy P and Gary sat at the front of the room answering the questions and nobody else.
If the club are serious about having a serious and proper discussion then they have to be prepared for people to come along and have a really good say and not to just roll their eyes at the questions and get defensive with their replies just because someone has had the audacity to ask something that irritates them due to all the effort they've put in down their years at the club.
I have a very simple question,the reply to which should only take six numbers arranged in a particular order starting with a 1,
How much money is in the club coffers?
Yes, there is no point at all in a discussion session if questions have to be sent in and vetted prior to the night and people can't just turn up on the night to ask their questions. Bloody hell, if that is seriously the case then this strikes of something straight out of North Korea!
Devil's Advocate wrote:Nath wrote:Devil's Advocate wrote:Nath wrote:Jack wrote:Was about to put this up. I know some can't get there, however if you have issues, which a lot of you do have. NOW is the time to actually say something, not just on here. Theyre giving you the opportunity, take it.
Mmmm.......maybe the powers that be are starting to take notice of what gets mentioned on here. At the end of the day, we are all Stourbridge fans, we all just want the best for the club. The forum is a place to be able to give an opinion and we all should continue to do just that. The world would be a boring place if everyone thought the same and had the same opinions. A good debate is perfectly healthy and should be encouraged. Is it going to be a formal questions and answer session with Andy P and Gary chairing it? If a discussion evening has been planned,that would certainly be the better way to work it.
So why does it say that questions have to be in by Wednesday evening then,are they being vetted?
This is not a bad idea as long as it's Andy P and Gary sat at the front of the room answering the questions and nobody else.
If the club are serious about having a serious and proper discussion then they have to be prepared for people to come along and have a really good say and not to just roll their eyes at the questions and get defensive with their replies just because someone has had the audacity to ask something that irritates them due to all the effort they've put in down their years at the club.
I have a very simple question,the reply to which should only take six numbers arranged in a particular order starting with a 1,
How much money is in the club coffers?
Yes, there is no point at all in a discussion session if questions have to be sent in and vetted prior to the night and people can't just turn up on the night to ask their questions. Bloody hell, if that is seriously the case then this strikes of something straight out of North Korea!
Lol,that makes Andy P Kim Jong-Un then
Nath wrote:Devil's Advocate wrote:Nath wrote:Devil's Advocate wrote:Nath wrote:Jack wrote:Was about to put this up. I know some can't get there, however if you have issues, which a lot of you do have. NOW is the time to actually say something, not just on here. Theyre giving you the opportunity, take it.
Mmmm.......maybe the powers that be are starting to take notice of what gets mentioned on here. At the end of the day, we are all Stourbridge fans, we all just want the best for the club. The forum is a place to be able to give an opinion and we all should continue to do just that. The world would be a boring place if everyone thought the same and had the same opinions. A good debate is perfectly healthy and should be encouraged. Is it going to be a formal questions and answer session with Andy P and Gary chairing it? If a discussion evening has been planned,that would certainly be the better way to work it.
So why does it say that questions have to be in by Wednesday evening then,are they being vetted?
This is not a bad idea as long as it's Andy P and Gary sat at the front of the room answering the questions and nobody else.
If the club are serious about having a serious and proper discussion then they have to be prepared for people to come along and have a really good say and not to just roll their eyes at the questions and get defensive with their replies just because someone has had the audacity to ask something that irritates them due to all the effort they've put in down their years at the club.
I have a very simple question,the reply to which should only take six numbers arranged in a particular order starting with a 1,
How much money is in the club coffers?
Yes, there is no point at all in a discussion session if questions have to be sent in and vetted prior to the night and people can't just turn up on the night to ask their questions. Bloody hell, if that is seriously the case then this strikes of something straight out of North Korea!
Lol,that makes Andy P Kim Jong-Un then
All the players will turn up on Saturday with the same haircuts!
Jane.N wrote:I think it's good that the club are even willing to have a fans question session - they don't have to.
A few threads topics seem to be a bit overlapped so forgive me if some comments are on here also.
A bit like Nathan I too preferred the club a few years back - I would list my 'real stour ' players differently and go back to bastable, Morgan, nicho, Jonah st al. It also bothers me that many of the committee involved then are either not involved now or even here anymore. It's sad and it doesn't feel the same. That said I think some of the comments about current players and their attitudes a bit harsh. And fans that have voiced their affection for the Midland alliance / southern Midland league have been accused of lacking ambition by fans on here!
I do also feel that some on here have personal agendas and gripes and use our dip in form as a great excuse to have a pop at the management. I don't want to name names but seeing as he tends to get the most stick at times I do NOT think DA is one of those people.
Some comments are cheap shots and remind me of the school playground.
That's not to say you shouldn't voice dissatisfaction - of course you should but some comments make me cringe.
The whole Sean geddes issue is now tiresome in the extreme. I was gutted when he left, he was a great player and a big loss. But generally he played really well so how did the management not get him to play well?? Maybe he is doing better as he is playing alongside better players. Again it's just personal gripes being used to belittle the management.
It is sad seeing us wobbling but there is still time to make something of the seasonand while some tthings irritate me a lot, I think some comments are not always helpful.
Sits back and waits to be shot......... ;-)
Jane.N wrote:I think it's good that the club are even willing to have a fans question session - they don't have to.
A few threads topics seem to be a bit overlapped so forgive me if some comments are on here also.
A bit like Nathan I too preferred the club a few years back - I would list my 'real stour ' players differently and go back to bastable, Morgan, nicho, Jonah st al. It also bothers me that many of the committee involved then are either not involved now or even here anymore. It's sad and it doesn't feel the same. That said I think some of the comments about current players and their attitudes a bit harsh. And fans that have voiced their affection for the Midland alliance / southern Midland league have been accused of lacking ambition by fans on here!
I do also feel that some on here have personal agendas and gripes and use our dip in form as a great excuse to have a pop at the management. I don't want to name names but seeing as he tends to get the most stick at times I do NOT think DA is one of those people.
Some comments are cheap shots and remind me of the school playground.
That's not to say you shouldn't voice dissatisfaction - of course you should but some comments make me cringe.
The whole Sean geddes issue is now tiresome in the extreme. I was gutted when he left, he was a great player and a big loss. But generally he played really well so how did the management not get him to play well?? Maybe he is doing better as he is playing alongside better players. Again it's just personal gripes being used to belittle the management.
It is sad seeing us wobbling but there is still time to make something of the seasonand while some tthings irritate me a lot, I think some comments are not always helpful.
Sits back and waits to be shot......... ;-)
TRM wrote:Questions DO NOT have to be submitted in advance. That is for the benefit of people who cannot make it on Thursday but are still keen to have their say. I worded it badly and will amend in the morning.
Turn up and ask whatever you want.
Jane.N wrote:100% agree with that post Nathan, it did have a nice feel back then. Taking down the hand written cardboard sign saying match postponed was the start of the slippery slope!! :-) ;-).
Thing is no one forces anyone to come so if people don't like it then.............!
Nath wrote:Jane.N wrote:100% agree with that post Nathan, it did have a nice feel back then. Taking down the hand written cardboard sign saying match postponed was the start of the slippery slope!! :-) ;-).
Thing is no one forces anyone to come so if people don't like it then.............!
Exactly, little things like that made the place feel homely, lovely feel to the club back then. Less commercially motivated, just Stourbridge lads earning not very much playing for the love of the game and pride in their home town team. I'm getting all emotional now Jane.
Devil's Advocate wrote:Nath wrote:Jane.N wrote:100% agree with that post Nathan, it did have a nice feel back then. Taking down the hand written cardboard sign saying match postponed was the start of the slippery slope!! :-) ;-).
Thing is no one forces anyone to come so if people don't like it then.............!
Exactly, little things like that made the place feel homely, lovely feel to the club back then. Less commercially motivated, just Stourbridge lads earning not very much playing for the love of the game and pride in their home town team. I'm getting all emotional now Jane.
Moist around the eyes Nath?
That's a directional change of around three feet for you compared to normal
Devil's Advocate wrote:Jane.N wrote:I think it's good that the club are even willing to have a fans question session - they don't have to.
A few threads topics seem to be a bit overlapped so forgive me if some comments are on here also.
A bit like Nathan I too preferred the club a few years back - I would list my 'real stour ' players differently and go back to bastable, Morgan, nicho, Jonah st al. It also bothers me that many of the committee involved then are either not involved now or even here anymore. It's sad and it doesn't feel the same. That said I think some of the comments about current players and their attitudes a bit harsh. And fans that have voiced their affection for the Midland alliance / southern Midland league have been accused of lacking ambition by fans on here!
I do also feel that some on here have personal agendas and gripes and use our dip in form as a great excuse to have a pop at the management. I don't want to name names but seeing as he tends to get the most stick at times I do NOT think DA is one of those people.
Some comments are cheap shots and remind me of the school playground.
That's not to say you shouldn't voice dissatisfaction - of course you should but some comments make me cringe.
The whole Sean geddes issue is now tiresome in the extreme. I was gutted when he left, he was a great player and a big loss. But generally he played really well so how did the management not get him to play well?? Maybe he is doing better as he is playing alongside better players. Again it's just personal gripes being used to belittle the management.
It is sad seeing us wobbling but there is still time to make something of the seasonand while some tthings irritate me a lot, I think some comments are not always helpful.
Sits back and waits to be shot......... ;-)
Good points well made Jane but the Geddes situation was always going to be a potential "running sore" especially if he flourished at Worcester which he has.
However you cut it £1000 for a player of his ability who was under contract is an
.absolute joke.
Yes it is absolutely, but that point has now been made time and time again. I am sure that whoever did the deal will be kicking themselves and regret being so wrong in the choices we made.
We don't know the full story. Seans side will say one thing, the officials another and probably somewhere in the middle is the truth! Sean also could have come on here and ripped into the club. Maybe it's to his credit that he hasn't, or maybe there is no real reason to?
It was sad, it was careless in the extreme but it's happened. We need to move on and the constant snidey comments are not helpful. Some posts are so transparent it's embarrassing.
Jane.N wrote:Devil's Advocate wrote:Jane.N wrote:I think it's good that the club are even willing to have a fans question session - they don't have to.
A few threads topics seem to be a bit overlapped so forgive me if some comments are on here also.
A bit like Nathan I too preferred the club a few years back - I would list my 'real stour ' players differently and go back to bastable, Morgan, nicho, Jonah st al. It also bothers me that many of the committee involved then are either not involved now or even here anymore. It's sad and it doesn't feel the same. That said I think some of the comments about current players and their attitudes a bit harsh. And fans that have voiced their affection for the Midland alliance / southern Midland league have been accused of lacking ambition by fans on here!
I do also feel that some on here have personal agendas and gripes and use our dip in form as a great excuse to have a pop at the management. I don't want to name names but seeing as he tends to get the most stick at times I do NOT think DA is one of those people.
Some comments are cheap shots and remind me of the school playground.
That's not to say you shouldn't voice dissatisfaction - of course you should but some comments make me cringe.
The whole Sean geddes issue is now tiresome in the extreme. I was gutted when he left, he was a great player and a big loss. But generally he played really well so how did the management not get him to play well?? Maybe he is doing better as he is playing alongside better players. Again it's just personal gripes being used to belittle the management.
It is sad seeing us wobbling but there is still time to make something of the seasonand while some tthings irritate me a lot, I think some comments are not always helpful.
Sits back and waits to be shot......... ;-)
Good points well made Jane but the Geddes situation was always going to be a potential "running sore" especially if he flourished at Worcester which he has.
However you cut it £1000 for a player of his ability who was under contract is an
.absolute joke.
Yes it is absolutely, but that point has now been made time and time again. I am sure that whoever did the deal will be kicking themselves and regret being so wrong in the choices we made.
We don't know the full story. Seans side will say one thing, the officials another and probably somewhere in the middle is the truth! Sean also could have come on here and ripped into the club. Maybe it's to his credit that he hasn't, or maybe there is no real reason to?
It was sad, it was careless in the extreme but it's happened. We need to move on and the constant snidey comments are not helpful. Some posts are so transparent it's embarrassing.
Stourbridge Football Club-Unofficial Forum » Stourbridge FC-2016/2017 Season » 2014/2015 Season » FAO Everyone...
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|