glassboypaul wrote:I take your point Brockmoor, absolutely I do, but the only argument against a reserve side is that revenues from admission would not exceed costs of running the side. If we ran it at a loss it would affect the playing budget and ground improvements budget.
I would absolutely love a reserve side I just struggle to see how it would be profitable.
This is always the hierarchy's default position Paul,"the money","better spent on the first team","better invested with Lawnswood Fencing" blah,blah,blah!
Most clubs progressing through the pyramid have a reserve side,i've always thought it to be important and i've said this on numerous occasions to the chairman.
What bloody point is there having teams at virtually every junior level from foetus upwards to youth then a gulf that the coaching staff believe to be so big that decent youth players can't break into the first team?
A reserve side would give both a link across this bridge but ALSO a match at a decent level for players presently out of favour or coming back from injury and it allows players to still feel part of a family rather than being farmed out to a multitude of lower league rivals.
I've also heard to argument that a Stourbridge FC Reserve side could not play above around Combination ( as was ) Division two or three but there's no reason at all that a side under a different name than Stourbridge FC ( but in effect still our side ) couldn't play at say West Midlands League level.
If we can still average 400+ playing the rubbish we have this season then we all know that a successful first team would average 500-600 and a decent reserve side of local lads who the crowd feel an affinity to would probably bring in Lye Town type crowds of 80-130 if they were doing okay and more if challenging.
I'd like to see a leadership at Stour that gave something like this a chance for three seasons at least to see if it bares fruit.